This study evaluated the impact of border management strategies on illicit trade reduction in Kenya’s one stop border post of Busia. A descriptive research design was used. The target population comprised community members living along the border, law enforcement officers, and relevant government officials such as chiefs and immigration officers, all of whom had valuable information regarding the issue. Purposive sampling was used to select the residents along Kenya-Uganda border and they were 156 in total. Purposive sampling was also used to select law enforcement officers, chiefs, and immigration officials. The questionnaire used was researcher-administered. A structured questionnaire was used to obtain information from the residents while interview schedule guides were used to obtain information from law enforcement officers, chiefs, and immigration officials. Hypotheses were tested using Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient (r) at α =0.05 level of significance. The results obtained from Kenya’s one stop border post of Busia revealed that corruption and weak enforcement mechanisms were the primary factors driving illicit trade along the Kenya-Uganda border. Smuggling routes also played a significant role, facilitating the illegal movement of goods. Additional contributors include cross-border demand, political instability, inadequate infrastructure, and poverty, each exacerbating the problem to varying degrees. Statistical analysis showed the critical role of technological adoption, inter-agency collaboration, and stringent border control measures in mitigating illicit trade. Pearson’s Correlation Coefficients demonstrated strong negative correlations between these variables and illicit trade prevalence, indicating that increased adoption of technology, enhanced inter-agency cooperation, and stricter border inspections significantly reduced illicit trade. Recommendations included implementing robust anti-corruption measures, equipping and training border officials, investing in advanced surveillance technologies, and fostering inter-agency coordination with integrated policies to ensure a comprehensive and unified approach to combating illicit trade.
Published in | Journal of Public Policy and Administration (Volume 9, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jppa.20250903.13 |
Page(s) | 144-152 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Impact, Border Management Strategies, Illicit Trade Reduction
[1] | Andreas, P. (2021). The illicit trade and conflict connection: Insight from US history. In The Routledge Handbook of Smuggling (pp. 355-368). Routledge. |
[2] | Von Lampe, K., Kurti, M., & Bae, J. (2014). Land of opportunities: the illicit trade in cigarettes in the United States. Corruption, Greed and Crime-Money: Sleaze and Shady Economy in Europe and Beyond. Oisterwijk, The Netherlands: Wolf Legal Publishers, 267-289. |
[3] |
van der Zee, K., van Walbeek, C., & Magadla, S. (2020). Illicit/cheap cigarettes in South Africa. Trends in organized crime, 23(3), 242-262.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12117-019-09372-9 |
[4] |
Shelley, L. I. (2018). Corruption & illicit trade. Daedalus, 147(3), 127-143.
https://direct.mit.edu/daed/article/147/3/127/27202/Corruption-amp-Illicit-Trade |
[5] | Chirchietti, N. (2017). The role of Innovation Hubs taking start-ups from idea to business: The case of Nairobi, Kenya. |
[6] |
Nugent, P., & Soi, I. (2020). One-stop border posts in East Africa: State encounters of the fourth kind. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 14(3), 433-454.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17531055.2020.1768468 |
[7] |
Tyson, J. E. (2018). One-stop border posts and informal livelihoods in Busia, Kenya. Development in Practice, 28(4), 562-573.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09614524.2018.1442813 |
[8] |
Baker, P., Berry, M., Czitrom, D., Hahn, B., Kloppenberg, J., Lamoreaux, N., & Witwer, D. (2019). Interchange: Corruption has a history. Journal of American History, 105(4), 912-938.
https://academic.oup.com/jah/article-abstract/105/4/912/5352872 |
[9] | De Waal, E. & Serfontein, E. (2015). The corruption bogey in South Africa: Is public education safe? South African Journal of Education, 35(1), 1-12. |
[10] | Kim, D., & Tajima, Y. (2022). Smuggling and border enforcement. International Organization, 76(4), 830-867. |
[11] |
Chen, X., Chris, H. C. C., Tsang, A., & Xiang, Y. (2022). Cross-border enforcement of securities laws and dividend payouts. The British Accounting Review, 54(6), 101117.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0890838922000464 |
[12] | Karaçay, A. B. (2017). Shifting human smuggling routes along Turkey’s borders. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 15(4), 97-108. |
[13] |
Diba, P., Papanicolaou, G., & Antonopoulos, G. A. (2019). The digital routes of human smuggling? Evidence from the UK. Crime prevention and community safety, 21, 159-175.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41300-019-00060-y |
[14] |
Arndt, S., Madrid Akpovo, S., Tesar, M., Han, T., Huang, F., & Halladay, M. (2021). Collaborative online learning across borders (COLAB): Examining intercultural understandings of preservice teachers in a virtual cross-cultural university-based program. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 35(2), 281-296.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02568543.2021.1880994 |
[15] | Moyo, I., & Nshimbi, C. C. (Eds.). (2019). African borders, conflict, regional and continental integration. Abingdon: Routledge. |
[16] | Byrne, C., Randall, N., & Theakston, K. (2020). Disjunctive prime ministerial leadership in British politics: From Baldwin to Brexit. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. |
[17] | Krylova, Y. (Ed.). (2024). Hubs of Illicit Trade in the Global Economy. Taylor & Francis. |
[18] | Gambo, J. O., Sola, P., & Ingram, V. (2022). Institutional and Governance Arrangements Shaping Kenya-Uganda Cross-Border Trade in Charcoal. Available at SSRN 4236030. |
[19] |
Smith, M. J., Ray, S. B., Raymond, A., Sienna, M., & Lilly, M. B. (2018). Long-term lessons on the effects of post-9/11 border thickening on cross-border trade between Canada and the United States: A systematic review. Transport Policy, 72, 198-207.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0967070X17306959 |
[20] | Nzioka, P. S. (2021). National security implications of human trafficking and migrant smuggling in Kenya (2009-2019) (Doctoral dissertation, Strathmore University). |
APA Style
Ogutu, K. O. (2025). The Impact of Border Management Strategies on the Reduction of Illicit Trade at Kenya’s Busia One Stop Border Post. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 9(3), 144-152. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20250903.13
ACS Style
Ogutu, K. O. The Impact of Border Management Strategies on the Reduction of Illicit Trade at Kenya’s Busia One Stop Border Post. J. Public Policy Adm. 2025, 9(3), 144-152. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20250903.13
@article{10.11648/j.jppa.20250903.13, author = {Kennedy Obumba Ogutu}, title = {The Impact of Border Management Strategies on the Reduction of Illicit Trade at Kenya’s Busia One Stop Border Post }, journal = {Journal of Public Policy and Administration}, volume = {9}, number = {3}, pages = {144-152}, doi = {10.11648/j.jppa.20250903.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20250903.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jppa.20250903.13}, abstract = {This study evaluated the impact of border management strategies on illicit trade reduction in Kenya’s one stop border post of Busia. A descriptive research design was used. The target population comprised community members living along the border, law enforcement officers, and relevant government officials such as chiefs and immigration officers, all of whom had valuable information regarding the issue. Purposive sampling was used to select the residents along Kenya-Uganda border and they were 156 in total. Purposive sampling was also used to select law enforcement officers, chiefs, and immigration officials. The questionnaire used was researcher-administered. A structured questionnaire was used to obtain information from the residents while interview schedule guides were used to obtain information from law enforcement officers, chiefs, and immigration officials. Hypotheses were tested using Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient (r) at α =0.05 level of significance. The results obtained from Kenya’s one stop border post of Busia revealed that corruption and weak enforcement mechanisms were the primary factors driving illicit trade along the Kenya-Uganda border. Smuggling routes also played a significant role, facilitating the illegal movement of goods. Additional contributors include cross-border demand, political instability, inadequate infrastructure, and poverty, each exacerbating the problem to varying degrees. Statistical analysis showed the critical role of technological adoption, inter-agency collaboration, and stringent border control measures in mitigating illicit trade. Pearson’s Correlation Coefficients demonstrated strong negative correlations between these variables and illicit trade prevalence, indicating that increased adoption of technology, enhanced inter-agency cooperation, and stricter border inspections significantly reduced illicit trade. Recommendations included implementing robust anti-corruption measures, equipping and training border officials, investing in advanced surveillance technologies, and fostering inter-agency coordination with integrated policies to ensure a comprehensive and unified approach to combating illicit trade.}, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Impact of Border Management Strategies on the Reduction of Illicit Trade at Kenya’s Busia One Stop Border Post AU - Kennedy Obumba Ogutu Y1 - 2025/07/30 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20250903.13 DO - 10.11648/j.jppa.20250903.13 T2 - Journal of Public Policy and Administration JF - Journal of Public Policy and Administration JO - Journal of Public Policy and Administration SP - 144 EP - 152 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-2696 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20250903.13 AB - This study evaluated the impact of border management strategies on illicit trade reduction in Kenya’s one stop border post of Busia. A descriptive research design was used. The target population comprised community members living along the border, law enforcement officers, and relevant government officials such as chiefs and immigration officers, all of whom had valuable information regarding the issue. Purposive sampling was used to select the residents along Kenya-Uganda border and they were 156 in total. Purposive sampling was also used to select law enforcement officers, chiefs, and immigration officials. The questionnaire used was researcher-administered. A structured questionnaire was used to obtain information from the residents while interview schedule guides were used to obtain information from law enforcement officers, chiefs, and immigration officials. Hypotheses were tested using Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient (r) at α =0.05 level of significance. The results obtained from Kenya’s one stop border post of Busia revealed that corruption and weak enforcement mechanisms were the primary factors driving illicit trade along the Kenya-Uganda border. Smuggling routes also played a significant role, facilitating the illegal movement of goods. Additional contributors include cross-border demand, political instability, inadequate infrastructure, and poverty, each exacerbating the problem to varying degrees. Statistical analysis showed the critical role of technological adoption, inter-agency collaboration, and stringent border control measures in mitigating illicit trade. Pearson’s Correlation Coefficients demonstrated strong negative correlations between these variables and illicit trade prevalence, indicating that increased adoption of technology, enhanced inter-agency cooperation, and stricter border inspections significantly reduced illicit trade. Recommendations included implementing robust anti-corruption measures, equipping and training border officials, investing in advanced surveillance technologies, and fostering inter-agency coordination with integrated policies to ensure a comprehensive and unified approach to combating illicit trade. VL - 9 IS - 3 ER -